<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Facebook wall features Twitter should have</title>
	<atom:link href="http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector Diaz</title>
		<link>http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Posting this time via Tweeter since I didn&#039;t know this could be done (albeit my point below has been proven by existential instantiation haha XD)

I like Facebook&#039;s feature &quot;True Friends&quot; because it allows you to have an open, public space for the people in your list that are just acquintainces and another private, more personal profile for those you know you can really trust. I feel this makes Facebook emphasize a little bit more on deep, personal connections, rather than just competing for the most connections (as may happen on Twitter). Also I think Facebook&#039;s interface of everything-in-a-click IM, messages, videos, photos, etc. give it a great advantage, Twitter might focus a little bit more on the interface design, because even though Facebook is more complex it is actually easier to use for many users. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posting this time via Tweeter since I didn&#8217;t know this could be done (albeit my point below has been proven by existential instantiation haha XD)</p>
<p>I like Facebook&#8217;s feature &#8220;True Friends&#8221; because it allows you to have an open, public space for the people in your list that are just acquintainces and another private, more personal profile for those you know you can really trust. I feel this makes Facebook emphasize a little bit more on deep, personal connections, rather than just competing for the most connections (as may happen on Twitter). Also I think Facebook&#8217;s interface of everything-in-a-click IM, messages, videos, photos, etc. give it a great advantage, Twitter might focus a little bit more on the interface design, because even though Facebook is more complex it is actually easier to use for many users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiny =)</title>
		<link>http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiny =)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>I like Facebook&#039;s feature &quot;True Friends&quot; because it allows you to have an open, public space for the people in your list that are just acquintainces and another private, more personal profile for those you know you can really trust. I feel this makes Facebook emphasize a little bit more on deep, personal connections, rather than just competing for the most connections (as may happen on Twitter). Also I think Facebook&#039;s interface of everything-in-a-click IM, messages, videos, photos, etc. give it a great advantage, Twitter might focus a little bit more on the interface design, because even though Facebook is more complex it is actually easier to use for many users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Facebook&#8217;s feature &#8220;True Friends&#8221; because it allows you to have an open, public space for the people in your list that are just acquintainces and another private, more personal profile for those you know you can really trust. I feel this makes Facebook emphasize a little bit more on deep, personal connections, rather than just competing for the most connections (as may happen on Twitter). Also I think Facebook&#8217;s interface of everything-in-a-click IM, messages, videos, photos, etc. give it a great advantage, Twitter might focus a little bit more on the interface design, because even though Facebook is more complex it is actually easier to use for many users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Rueda</title>
		<link>http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Rueda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Rueda</title>
		<link>http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Rueda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julianapena.com/2010/02/three-facebook-wall-features-twitter-should-have/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
